Tightening of the Noose
by Dr. Ajay Chrungoo
evil guiding the government policy on internally displaced Kashmiri Hindus has
to be fathomed and faced in its stark nakedness. On 21 January, 2010, the
Government of Jammu and Kashmir, Service Selection Board, brought out the
Advertisement Notice for 81 posts, supposed to be filled as a part of the
employment package for 3000 'Kashmiri Migrants' declared by the Prime Minister
of India. The Notice published in the local news papers also included the
proforma of the 'Agreement' to be signed by the applicant Kashmiri 'migrant' in
order to be appointed after getting selected for the particular post. The format
of the agreement to be signed is revealing:
The executioner has been
appointed on probation as_______in the______ Department____subject to execution
of this Agreement and inter-alia on the explicit condition that this appointment
as such shall subsist only so long as he serves in the Kashmir Valley; and
Whereas, that the
appointee shall be considered for regularization on the basis of performance and
satisfactory completion of period of probation in accordance with afore
mentioned rules and
Whereas, that the
appointee agrees to serve in Kashmir Valley and will at no stage opt or seek for
transfer outside Kashmir Valley; and
Whereas, that the
appointee agrees that in case he migrates again from Kashmir Valley at any stage
for any reasons whatsoever, he will stand automatically terminated from the
services and shall have no claim against any post under the State; and
Whereas, if the appointee
wilfully neglects or refuses to perform duty in Kashmir Valley the appointing
authority shall immediately terminate the service; and
Whereas, the appointee
will at no stage seek to opt for transfer outside the Kashmir Valley.
Now, therefore I accept
the said terms and conditions of appointment...
For any Kashmir Hindu, what
is being said in this agreement, brazenly and between the words and lines,
should not be difficult to understand. But there are willing amongst the
Kashmiri Hindu to give such undertaking only to get the job.
The studies conducted on the
behaviour of victims of genocidal processes clearly tell us that victims of
genocide cultivate a fatal wishful thinking. They always, want to believe that
the worse is already over. Or that what has already happened is the climax and
the world in which they are living and the government which is at the helms will
not allow the worse. The victims have a suicidal naivety of reading each step
taken by the perpetrators to tighten the genocidal noose around them as a
A small sample of the
contemporary empirical evidence reproduced below will help us to measure the
depth of the evil enshrined in the text of the 'Agreement' reproduced above.
Kashmiri Pandit Sangarsh
Samiti, an organization of Kashmiri Hindus still living in Kashmir Valley,
sent an open letter to the Prime Minister of India on 16 November, 2009 as
well as the Chief Minister of the Jammu and Kashmir state, as also to the
various Muslim leaders of the Valley. The letter states, "On 15th November,
2009, two of our members went to Bhairav Ghat, Chattabal, at Srinagar, to take
some pictures of the temple ruins so that its fate could be settled with the
concerned authorities. But the members of the Majority Community who had
encroached the temple land abstained them from taking pictures and used
un-parliamentary language against the Kashmiri Pandits and their religious
places. They started the slogans like ‘Jis tarah humne tumhare
mandiroan ko jalaya hai vaise hi tum logon ko jalayenge, aur kisi ko pata bhi
nahi chalega’. The way we have burnt your temples, in the same way we
will burn you and no one will know about you. 'Yahan sirf Islam
chalega'. Only Islam will prevail here. "India ko lagta hai ki
tum logon ko vapas layega, jo bi aaye ga mara jayega, hum log phir se gun
uthayenge'. India thinks that they can bring Kashmiri Pandits back to
Valley, whosoever comes will die, we will again raise arms against you. The
mob there even manhandled the members of KPSS and they had to leave the place.
Even they could not file an FIR against the mob due to the life threat given
by these hooligans belonging to a particular community... KPSS strongly
condemns the act and appeals to the separatist leadership to look into the
matter and reply back within a stipulated time so that when at one hand they
recommend the return of Kashmiri Pandits to the Valley then why on the other
hand their men are thirsty for KP blood...KPSS requests the State and Central
administration to re-think about their proposal to bring back the Kashmiri
Pandits to the Valley instead register the fresh lot of migrants who will
leave the Valley in coming days if the situation is not taken care of in due
course of time...KPSS also appeals to the international community to take the
matter seriously and ensure that all necessary steps are taken to safeguard
the Kashmiri Pandits in the Valley."
This appeal by an
organisation of the Hindus still living in Valley is revealing given the fact
that it involves grave risks.
The state government
recently gave the numbers of the Kashmiri Hindus living in the Valley on the
floor of the assembly. The State government puts the number of Kashmiri Hindus
living in Valley just above 800 families and the actual number of persons
below 4000. The figures given by the State government are much more than the
figures which various surveys conducted by the Kashmiri Hindus living in
Valley have underlined. These independent surveys have put the number of total
Hindus living in Valley presently well below 3000. In 1996 when the elected
government took over after a prolonged stint of Governor's rule in the State,
the number of Kashmiri Hindus given by the government from time to time was
always between 10,000 to 15,000. For political reasons of undermining the
gravity of situation in the Valley, the governments at the helm of affairs
have always indulged in exaggerating the number of Hindus living in Kashmir.
But if we take the government figures as true, even then, retrospectively the
deterioration of the situation cannot be hidden or fudged. The number of
Kashmiri Hindus living in Valley, compared to the government figures of 1996,
when the democratic process started, has fallen by more than sixty percent.
The number of small entrepreneurs who chose to stay put in the Valley even
after events of 1990 has almost evaporated.
The appeal by the Hindu
organisation of Valley to Prime Minister reveals a dark reality of a
The state police
approached Panun Kashmir office recently to help them in persuading the
survivors of Nadimarg massacre to come forward to give witness against the
arrested terrorists involved in the massacre. Nadimarg survivors outrightly
refused to come forward to give witness. They had very pertinent reasons
relating to the total lack of faith in the sincerity of the state government
and their own security. The reasons they gave are revealing. They said that
immediately after the massacre in which 22 Kashmiri Hindus were killed Sh. L.K.
Advani visited the place but to their utmost dismay, insisted his security
personnel not to allow any of the victims to come closer to him. One of the
victims broke the security cordon and shouted what security assurances can the
state government offer when, all the policemen living just in the adjacent
house refused to come to their rescue while terrorists were making their way
into the houses eventually killing twenty two persons. They revealed that one
of the eyewitnesses was approached by the government officials themselves to
withdraw his witness. They said that the state government wilfully revealed
the names of those, to the public, who had offered themselves as eye witnesses
of the massacre when the same should have been kept strictly confidential.
They said when Dr. Farooq Abdullah publicly said that the judge, who
pronounced the judgement for Afzal Guru, needed security, it sent shivers down
their spine and they decided against offering any witness. They also asked the
reasons for the reluctance of the State government to transfer the case to
Jammu or any other part of India. They said they had already paid enough
price for staying put in Valley and were no longer ready to pay more price.
Two Hindus from the same
Nadimarg village were appointed as laboratory assistants in the migrant
teachers cell in Jammu. Subsequently they were promoted as teachers and
transferred to Shopian in Kashmir Valley. They joined their new posting in
January. After joining they experienced intense harassment at their new place
of posting. They approached their officer in charge who was not only
dismissive but also insulting in his behaviour. Feeling totally insecure, the
two teachers abandoned the place of their posting and approached the
government to adjust them at their previous place of posting in Jammu. They
also gave a written consent to retrospectively forego their promotion and the
benefits there off.
A Hindu unmarried girl
(name kept secret) was appointed on compassionate grounds under SRO 43 in a
government deptt at Ganderbal after her father who was working in Relief
Commissioners office passed away. She had to abandon her job after
experiencing intense harassment and is now back to Jammu.
Another Hindu girl (name
kept secret) was appointed some time back in a government department in
Anantnag district. The very first day in office a Class-4th employee made
obscene overtures towards her. She appealed to an elderly employee of the same
department for intervention. His behaviour was more obscene and insulting.
While the other employees of the department looked helplessly, a clerk of the
same department advised her to have ‘nikah’ with him to escape
humiliation and harassment. The young lady returned to Jammu and approached a
Pandit leader, who has been in recent times canvassing for return of Kashmiri
Hindus to Valley, to help her. The leader told her that for escaping from such
humiliation she will have to give up her job or otherwise she will have to put
up with this situation.
Two more recent anecdotes
are of value in the context of our discussion here. A Kashmiri Hindu of
Kupwara district went to his native place to offer his condolences to the
family of a Muslim friend who had passed away. The late friend had helped the
Kashmiri Hindu during his exile in Jammu. He went to the graveyard where his
friend was buried to lay flowers on his grave. Local Muslims were accompanying
him and they also offered their ‘Nimaz-e-Fatiha’ at the grave of
the departed soul. On his return just outside the graveyard he found children
playing marbles. (Saz-u-Guti) . The boy who was hitting one marble with
the other would say, ‘Kafir Haa Moodh -I have killed the
infidel’, whenever he succeeded in hitting the marbal on the ground with the
marbel in his hand. From the graveyard the Kashmiri Hindu proceeded towards
the house of his departed friend. Just in the compound he found children
playing hide and seek. One group which was seeking the hidden ones was
reciting, “Bata Kot, Bata Kot Ratitoaney, Honyi Hund Doad Chyavnavitaney'
(catch, catch the Pandit boy, and make him drink the milk of a bitch).
Seeing the discourse communalised to this extent that even the folk plays of
children were filled with communal hatred, the Kashmiri Hindu returned to
Jammu crest fallen.
A Kashmiri Hindu living in
Valley all these years came to attend the marriage of his relative. His close
relation with whom he was staying was shocked when the minor daughter of his
relation from Kashmir said in all innocence to his father, ‘Daidiya,
Daidiya, Yeti Kyazi Chi Lokchi Naatu, Kasheeri Hai Chi Asi Asaan Baji Naatu’-
‘Why do we have small mutton
pieces here. In Kashmir we have big pieces’. The pieces of mutton from a lamb
are always smaller than the pieces of beef.
These very recent anecdotes
reveal a lot. They should make anyone particularly a Hindu to see the ‘Evil’
deep inside right upto its core. The ‘Agreement’ which Kashmiri Hindu youth have
to sign in case they are employed means that they have to accept the social
order existing in the Valley radicalised, communalised and criminalised beyond
description in toto and unconditionally.
whatever its legal validity, is a proforma of consent for total capitulation. It
is also a declaration of voluntarily abandoning of all rights and immunities
which the constitution offers to any citizen. To have the job, a Kashmiri Hindu,
has to persevere and put up with any situation in the Valley. The irony of the
situation is that for all the jobs for which the Hindus have to sign the type of
‘Agreement’ produced here, will be financed by the Central Government.
The message is clear, any
concession to Kashmiri Hindus from government of India entails a submission to
the social and political order in the state which unleashed the genocide on
Kashmiri Hindus and also persisted with its perpetuation. We are witnessing the
denial of the genocide as well as its abettment by both the State and Central
governments. The ‘Agreement’ by implication alludes that the internal
displacement of Hindus was not a necessity and the relief which Hindus have been
receiving is basically a burden.
The successive State
governments have followed a dictum in their handling of the colossal tragedy of
internal displacement of Kashmiri Hindus and that is, “We will do nothing for
the migrants which will be an incentive not to return”. This dictum has made the
government and the political class to block any help to Kashmiri Hindus and
pushed the government to enforce and perpetuate destitution amongst Kashmiri
Hindus particularly the youth.
We are witnessing a process
of making victims of genocide to capitulate totally in front of the perpetrator.
Internationally reputed scholars and imminent citizens came out with a strong
joint statement in commemoration of the Armenian Genocide of 1915. The statement
said, “Denial murders the dignity of the survivors and seeks to destroy
remembrance of the crime”.
The ‘Agreement’ which
displaced Kashmiri Hindus have to sign to get a job for survival destroys their
dignity and also any process of remembrance of the crimes which were committed
on them and which are being committed on them and which will be committed
against them in the future.
word, when government of India chose to declare a relief and employment package
to displaced Kashmiri Hindus linking it to their return, it was only a
declaration of their abondonement. And when Manish Tiwari said that Kashmiri
Pandits were forced out by Jagmohan and Arun Jaiteley told his activists in
Jammu not to be use the word ‘genocide’ for the tragedy which had befallen
Kashmiri Hindus, it only signified that the noose of genocidal attrition of
Kashmiri Hindus is tightening further.
*(The author is Chairman
of Panun Kashmir)